ERISA Litigation

ERISA Litigation

Overview

Schiff Hardin attorneys have been providing plan sponsors, fiduciaries, service providers, and Taft-Hartley trustees with effective representation in all aspects of ERISA litigation in courts across the country for decades.

Led by a former trial attorney from the ERISA litigation division of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), our team is composed of skilled trial lawyers who are knowledgeable in the complexities of ERISA, and collaborate with the firm’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group. Our strengths include:

  • Trial, settlement, and appeal of complex ERISA fiduciary breach cases involving the government and private parties
  • Defending benefit claims litigation
  • Defending DOL investigations of fiduciaries and non-fiduciary service providers
  • Compliance with ERISA and tax laws

We have extensive experience representing clients under investigation by the DOL, and have helped many avoid further action by the DOL.

We represent plan fiduciaries, directors and officers, as well as plan service providers in class actions and other litigation alleging violations of ERISA’s fiduciary standards of care in a variety of contexts, including:

  • Fiduciary breach allegations involving the selection and monitoring of service providers
  • Retention of company stock in the 401(k) menu
  • Claims related to self-dealing and prohibited transactions
  • Subrogation and benefit claims
  • Participant challenges to downsizing and severance claims

We regularly help clients maneuver through the complexities of terminating defined benefit plans and represent clients in cases involving the Pension Benefit Guarantee Administration. We also defend clients in actions alleging delinquent contributions to Taft-Hartley plans or in actions involving the assessment of withdrawal liability.

Employment Law Landscape

Consideration of Pay History to Justify Gender Wage Gaps Held Unlawful by Ninth Circuit on Eve of National Equal Pay Day

The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Monday, on the eve of National Equal Pay Day, that it violates the Equal Pay Act to use pay history to justify wage gaps between male and female employees for the same or substantially similar work. The decision in Rizo v. Yovino, No. 16-15372 (9th Cir. Apr.... Continue Reading

VISIT THE BLOG