Schiff Hardin LLP November 2008
Schiff Hardin Nonprofit News

Learn more about Tax-Exempt Organizations at Schiff Hardin.

Attorneys In This Practice

Mazen Asbahi
Michael Burnstein
Lisa M. Chessare
Todd R. Eskelsen
Nicole Finitzo
Louise M. Fitzsimons
Andrew M. Grumet
P. Gregory Hess
Michael J. Huft
Kim Kamin
Katherine J. Levy
Stephen A. Marcus
Christine R. W. Quigley
Thomas P. White

Schiff Hardin Offices

One Atlantic Center,
Suite 2300
1201 West Peachtree
Atlanta, GA 30309

225 Franklin Street,
Suite 2600 
Boston, MA 02110 

6600 Sears Tower
233 S Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606

One Westminster Place
Suite 200
Lake Forest, IL 60045

900 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022

One Market, Spear Tower
32nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

1666 K Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

- - - - - - - - -

Join our mailing list.

Forward this issue to a friend or colleague.

- - - - - - - - -

Web Site Woes

Modern technology is all around us and, like most businesses, nonprofits are spending a lot of time and money in building effective Web sites. A good Web site allows a nonprofit to establish its presence, build and maintain a constituency, provide information, raise funds and generally advance its mission.

For most nonprofits, the construction and maintenance of a Web site will require hiring an outside consultant to provide these services. Any time the organization retains a consultant, even a consultant who is a volunteer providing services for free, it is important to agree in writing who will own the copyright in the work product that is developed. Many organizations, nonprofit and for-profit alike, overlook this task. The failure to do so can have dramatic ramifications. Copyright law generally provides that ownership of a copyright initially belongs to the author. For example, the author of a book owns the copyright to the book. Similarly, the third party developer of a Web site will own the copyright in the design of that Web site unless there is a written agreement assigning ownership to the nonprofit.

Ownership of the copyright to a Web site's design is important because the owner generally controls how the site can be used. For example:

  • The owner of the copyright may be able to decide whether other nonprofits can use the same design (e.g., can a consultant hired by ABC charity to design its Web site design Web sites for 30, 50 or even 100 other charities that look just like ABC's Web site?).
  • The owner of the copyright may be able to prevent anyone else from using the Web site in the future (e.g., can a pro bono consultant who designed a charity's Web site prevent the charity from using the Web site if the relationship between the consultant and the charity ends poorly?).
  • The owner of the copyright may be able to prevent anyone else from altering the Web site in the future (e.g., can a volunteer who designed the Web site for ABC charity prevent the charity from updating the Web site?).

Many organizations mistakenly think they own the rights in their developed Web site because they paid for it as a "work for hire." The "work made for hire" doctrine would generally give an employer ownership of work product developed by an employee within the scope of his or her duties. However, it does not apply to works, including Web sites, developed by third parties. Therefore, it is important that you enter into a written agreement with any third party hired to provide development services.

In many cases, a consultant will provide a form agreement that addresses basic issues such as the scope of the services and the manner in which fees will be charged. You should examine this agreement to make sure it specifies who will be the owner of the copyright. If the copyright is retained by the consultant, then you should, at the very least, make sure that the agreement grants your organization an appropriate license to use and modify the Web site to fit your needs. On the other hand, if the agreement is silent on the issue of copyright ownership, then you should make sure that the copyright is assigned to your organization. In the absence of any explicit license, the law will normally provide that the charity is entitled only to an implied license to use the Web site design. An implied license, however, can be risky because the scope of the implied license (re-use, for what purpose, ability to modify, etc.) is usually unclear and must be determined from the parties' intent and conduct. The problem with this is that a consultant might try to argue that the implied license is not exclusive and that the consultant can reuse the 'code' or other materials developed for you. If this should happen, then you might soon find lots of other charities with Web sites that look just like yours. Equally as dangerous, the consultant might argue that the implied license only grants you the right to use the Web site as-is and does not permit you to update or modify it going forward.

Intellectual property laws are complex and should be carefully considered whenever a consultant or other third party is used to build or maintain a Web site. Although many of the provisions of the relationship may appear straightforward, many are not.

This is yet another important example of why operating a nonprofit can be a tricky business. The laws impacting nonprofit organizations (including family foundations) are complicated. If you are involved with a nonprofit or are thinking of becoming involved with one, make sure you seek experienced skilled professionals to work with you and your organization. The consequences of missteps in administering the organization can extend far beyond the organization.

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

"Spotlight On: Charley's Fund," Philanthropic Spotlight (October 2008)
"Extra! Extra! Read All About It!," Nonprofit News (October 2008)
"IRS Abolishes Advance Ruling Period for Public Charities, Makes Other Changes to Public Support Test," Tax-Exempt Organizations Update (September 2008)
"Embezzlement and Nonprofts," Nonprofit News (September 2008)
"Spotlight On: Cherkin Preston Foundation," Philanthropic Spotlight (September 2008)
"IRS Releases Thoroughly Redesigned Form 990 for 2008," Tax-Exempt Organizations Update (August 2008)

ABOUT SCHIFF HARDIN LLP

Schiff Hardin LLP is enthusiastically committed to serving the legal needs of tax-exempt organizations, matched by significant experience and practice capabilities in this area. Our attorneys provide comprehensive counsel to a wide array of public and private philanthropic, health care, medical and scientific research, housing, neighborhood redevelopment, cultural, artistic, civic, college and educational, and religious organizations, as well as social welfare organizations, trade associations and business leagues, business and housing cooperatives, and professional fundraisers. For more information about the services Schiff Hardin LLP provides to tax-exempt organizations, please feel free to contact us.

© 2008 Schiff Hardin LLP

This publication has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm.
It is not intended to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter.
Under rules applicable to the professional conduct of attorneys in various jurisdictions,
it may be considered advertising material.

For more information visit our Web site at www.schiffhardin.com.

Click here to manage your subscriptions.

Click here to unsubscribe from this list.