Schiff Hardin LLP April 8, 2009


Click Here to Register
for our April 28, 2009
Breakfast Briefing on the Latest Labor and Employment Issues!

Learn more about the Labor and Employment Group at Schiff Hardin.

Attorneys In This Practice

Thurston C. Bailey
Eric L. Barnum
Howard R. Barron
Wendi J. Berkowitz
Max G. Brittain Jr.
William J. Carroll
Ashley G. Eddy
Nicole Finitzo
Larry B. Garrett
Stephen M. Hankins
Victoria Hartanto
Valarie Hays
Charlene Q. Kalebic
Bita A. Karabian
Paula M. Ketcham
Matthew D. Lahey
Neil Lloyd
Catherine M. Masters
Ralph A. Morris
Marc L. Silverman
Henry W. Sledz Jr.
Patricia Costello Slovak
Drahcir M. Smith
Julie Furer Stahr
Kathleen A. Stimeling
Catherine H. Thompson
Richard L. Verkler
Nora Kersten Walsh
Tamera M. Woodard

Schiff Hardin Offices

One Atlantic Center,
Suite 2300
1201 West Peachtree
Atlanta, GA 30309

225 Franklin Street,
Suite 2600 
Boston, MA 02110 

6600 Sears Tower
233 S Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606

One Westminster Place
Suite 200
Lake Forest, IL 60045

900 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022

One Market, Spear Tower
32nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

1666 K Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

- - - - - - - - -

Join our mailing list.

Forward this alert to a friend or colleague.

- - - - - - - - -

Schiff Hardin Labor and Employment Alert

Protecting Employee Personal Identifying Information:
New York State is the Latest State to Enact Protections Against Identity Theft

By Victoria Hartanto

New York has joined a growing number of states that have enacted laws intended to protect employees from identity theft. In effect as of January 3, 2009, the Employee Personal Identifying Information Law (New York Labor Law ý 203-d) imposes more stringent requirements on employers in collecting, maintaining and disclosing the personal information of their employees.

Specifically, employers are required to prevent unlawful disclosures of an employee's personal identifying information to the public. "Personal identifying information" is broadly defined to include an employee's social security number, home address or telephone number, personal e-mail address, Internet user name or password, parent's surname prior to marriage, or driver's license number.

In addition, the New York statute restricts an employer's use of social security numbers. Employers are prohibited from:

  • publicly posting or displaying an employee's social security number;
  • visibly printing an employee's social security number on identification cards, including time cards;
  • placing a social security number in files with unrestricted access; or
  • using a social security number as an identification number for purposes of any occupational listing.

Enforcement and Penalties

The statute mandates that employers affirmatively implement mechanisms to safeguard against the use of employees' personal identifying information and to inform employees of their rights under this new law. Employers face civil penalties of up to $500 per violation for any "knowing" violation of these provisions. Importantly, an employer's failure to advise employees of these provisions, or failure to put policies and procedures in place to safeguard against a violation, is presumptive evidence of a "knowing" violation.

Similar Privacy Laws in Other States

The New York statute is part of a nationwide trend addressing the issue of identity theft in the workplace, particularly with regard to social security numbers. Laws regarding employee personal information vary from state to state, so employers should investigate whether their policies comply with applicable state law.

In California, for example, businesses are restricted in their use and disclosure of social security numbers. Moreover, certain businesses are required to use safeguards to ensure the security of a broader class of personal information, defined as a name plus social security number, driver's license number, or financial account number. In addition, businesses that collect and maintain personal information are required to notify all affected individuals in the event of a security breach. The Illinois legislature has enacted similar laws protecting consumers' social security numbers, and requiring notification if unauthorized persons may have accessed consumer personal information.

Conclusion

In light of the New York statute's requirement that employers actively safeguard against violations of the law, employers are advised to review their privacy policies and procedures, and make certain that all required notices are properly communicated to employees. Schiff Hardin attorneys are available to assist with reviewing and revising employer privacy policies.

- - - - -

ABOUT SCHIFF HARDIN LLP

Schiff Hardin represents management in labor matters and employment-related litigation, and provides counsel to employers with respect to all legal aspects of employer-employee relations.  Our firm's labor law practice encompasses both the private sector and the public sector for large and small employers in a broad range of markets and industries.

For more information, please feel free to contact us.

- - - - -

RECENT LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT PUBLICATIONS

"WARNing Signs in a Slumping Economy: What is Proper Notice in a RIF?," Labor and Employment Update (March 23, 2009)
"Summary of New Executive Orders Affecting Government Contractors," Labor and Employment Update (March 4, 2009)
"New Federal Government Program: COBRA Subsidies," Labor and Employment Update (February 20, 2009)

© 2009 Schiff Hardin LLP

This publication has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm.
It is not intended to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter.
Under rules applicable to the professional conduct of attorneys in various jurisdictions,
it may be considered advertising material.

For more information visit our Web site at www.schiffhardin.com.

Click here to manage your subscriptions.

Click here to unsubscribe from this list.