Schiff Hardin LLP July 9, 2009

Learn more about Environmental Law at Schiff Hardin.

For more information, contact one of the following attorneys:

Amy Antoniolli
Kathleen C. Bassi
Stephen J. Bonebrake
Renee Cipriano
Daniel J. Deeb
Jeremy R. Hojnicki
Bina Joshi
Kathryn M. Long
David M. Loring
Jane E. Montgomery
Joshua R. More
Mary Ann Mullin
Paul M. Previde
Gabriel M. Rodriguez
Andrew N. Sawula
Rocky N. Unruh
Sarah D. Youngblood

Schiff Hardin Offices

One Atlantic Center,
Suite 2300
1201 West Peachtree
Atlanta, GA 30309

225 Franklin Street,
Suite 2600 
Boston, MA 02110 

233 S Wacker Drive
Suite 6600
Chicago, IL 60606

One Westminster Place
Suite 200
Lake Forest, IL 60045

900 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022

One Market, Spear Tower
32nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

1666 K Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

- - - - - - - - -

Join our mailing list.

Forward this profile to a friend or colleague.

- - - - - - - - -

Georgia Appeals Court Reverses a Lower Court Decision That a PSD Air Permit Must Contain CO2 Emission Limits

On July 7, 2009, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's ruling that a prevention of significant deterioration ("PSD") air permit was invalid because it failed to include a limit on a proposed coal-fired power plant's carbon dioxide gas ("CO2") emissions. (Longleaf Energy v. Friends of the Chattahoochee, Ga. Ct. App., No. A09A0387).

In reversing the lower court's ruling, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that because neither the Clean Air Act nor Georgia state law presently contains regulations controlling CO2 emissions, including a CO2 emission limitation in the permit was not required. The appeals court recognized that the federal Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") recently issued a proposed endangerment finding for greenhouse gases and that Congress is considering legislation to address climate change with CO2 emissions caps under the proposed American Clean Energy and Security Act. The appeals court, however, emphasized that EPA has not yet issued any final findings and that federal legislation is only pending. The appeals court stated that to require a CO2 emission limitation in a PSD permit now "would preempt ongoing Congressional and EPA efforts to formulate a CO2 emissions policy for all the states, and require the [Georgia Environmental Protection Division] to invent in a vacuum CO2 emission controls for permits." According to the appeals court, this would result "in a flood of litigation over permits, and impose far-reaching economic hardship on the State."

This decision will remain precedent for rejecting citizen suit challenges to PSD permits that do not contain CO2 emission limitations unless and until EPA issues final regulations controlling CO2 emissions or federal climate change legislation is signed into law.

To view the Longleaf Energy v. Friends of the Chattahoochee decision, click here.

For questions regarding this Environmental Update, please contact any of the attorneys in Schiff Hardin's Environmental Group.

RECENT ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLICATIONS

"EPA Lists 44 "High Hazard Potential" Coal Ash Sites," Environmental Update (June 30, 2009)
"Climate Bill Narrowly Passes in U.S. House," Environmental Update (June 29, 2009)
"EPA Has No Permitting Role When The Army Corps Issues Fill Permits," Environmental Update (June 26, 2009)
"State-Issued "No Further Remediation" Letter May Not Defeat RCRA Claims," Environmental Update (June 23, 2009)

ABOUT SCHIFF HARDIN LLP

Schiff Hardin's diverse environmental practice advises clients engaged in a wide variety of industries and commercial endeavors such as electric generation, natural gas distribution and production, chemical manufacturing, auto and auto parts manufacturing, consumer goods manufacturing, real estate development and investments by financial institutions and equity investors.

For more information, contact us.

 

© 2009 Schiff Hardin LLP

This publication has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm.
It is not intended to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter.
Under rules applicable to the professional conduct of attorneys in various jurisdictions,
it may be considered advertising material.

For more information visit our Web site at www.schiffhardin.com.

Click here to manage your subscriptions.

Click here to unsubscribe from this list.